CurvedSpace Forums: UFF movement Vs Ultimate Pkers - CurvedSpace Forums

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • {lang:pm_locked} This topic is locked

UFF movement Vs Ultimate Pkers ^^^^^

#16 {lang:macro__useroffline}   rudeboy2k5 {lang:icon}

  • ^its 2k6 now u idiot^
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 370
  • Joined: 19-November 05

Posted 14 February 2006 - 08:21 PM

They are also going to war with KG! For some reason some members want to drop war against DOR, but i told them yes , if they drop there war against KG, but they declined.
0

#17 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Skyone {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 4,310
  • Joined: 01-October 05
  • Location:uk

Posted 14 February 2006 - 11:47 PM

Wait...so let me get this straight were all going to wear full bronze and our weapons also have to be bronze???
0

#18 {lang:macro__useroffline}   dokimos0rg {lang:icon}

  • Visionary Founder of UFF
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 568
  • Joined: 15-November 05
  • Location:uk

Posted 16 February 2006 - 09:37 PM

Rudeboy says to me in Runescape chat that Ultimate PKers Clan won't fight if allies come?

All the UFF Movement clans are interjoined! We are all about being allies!

Some Ultimate PKers! ROFL!

I say, they either face us or they change the name of their clan.

user posted imageuser posted image
0

#19 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Jake {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 4,637
  • Joined: 24-October 04
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 12:42 AM

... if i didn't give away all my crap i'd go and beat 'em a bit with some magic... but no.
0

#20 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Darkness {lang:icon}

  • CHILDREN!
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 11,225
  • Joined: 12-April 03
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 12:51 AM

QUOTE(dokimos0rg @ Feb 12 2006, 05:24 PM)
QUOTE(Callum Jacques Spartacus Liverot @ Feb 11 2006, 12:29 AM)
You show that gai club how it's done thumb.gif
{lang:macro__view_post}



CJSL, when I read your post and saw your avatar I just laughed to tears. Thank you, friend, I needed that.

Thanks for the vote of confidence.
{lang:macro__view_post}


You are aware that he was being sarcastic right? Whatever_anim.gif

QUOTE(dokimos0rg @ Feb 16 2006, 01:37 PM)
Rudeboy says to me in Runescape chat that Ultimate PKers Clan won't fight if allies come? 

All the UFF Movement clans are interjoined!  We are all about being allies! 

Some Ultimate PKers!  ROFL!

I say, they either face us or they change the name of their clan.
{lang:macro__view_post}


Oh, and I think it is pretty funny how you decide to insult all of the clans that decide they don't want to have almost every single person in their clan under level 40 Whatever_anim.gif Some people like to have experienced Runescape players in their clans so they can do more unique things, like, say, going to kill some big monster or something, instead of having 38490267 low levels complaining that they are too low level to even hit the big monster and would die in one hit, etc. So, really, this 'Fr33 cl4nning for allll! Let's go try to k1ll dudes who say they don't want people under level 50!?E1/ trF :O :O :O!" Seriously. It's pretty "gai".







“In the valley of hope, there is no winter.”

0

#21 {lang:macro__useroffline}   dokimos0rg {lang:icon}

  • Visionary Founder of UFF
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 568
  • Joined: 15-November 05
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 02:00 AM

Mr. Darkness, if you had been familiar with what UFF is about you wouldn't be posting such ignorance.

We are NOT saying wilderness teams should not have recommended levels. It is about clanning.

UFF has had wilderness teams recommending certain levels or higher. To do otherwise may create an unequal team in many circumstances.

Listen, Darkness, it is about CLANNING not PKING that we disapprove of resticted levels. Get it?

Apparently you happen to like the idea of snuffy little clans of exclusive players. So go ahead and join that if that's your personal thing.





user posted imageuser posted image
0

#22 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Jake {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 4,637
  • Joined: 24-October 04
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 02:56 AM

clans pretty much are wilderness teams dokimos.

why do you hate clans with any reqs at all?

and dont call them "gai clubs"

call them noobs or something... it dosent make you look as bad



(i know a mod is probably gonna tell me to stfu but im not flaming him... you would know it if I was)

This post has been edited by Googlebot™: 17 February 2006 - 02:57 AM

0

#23 {lang:macro__useroffline}   ©allum {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 7,194
  • Joined: 21-July 03
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 03:17 AM

QUOTE(Darkness @ Feb 17 2006, 01:51 PM)
QUOTE(dokimos0rg @ Feb 12 2006, 05:24 PM)
QUOTE(Callum Jacques Spartacus Liverot @ Feb 11 2006, 12:29 AM)
You show that gai club how it's done thumb.gif
{lang:macro__view_post}



CJSL, when I read your post and saw your avatar I just laughed to tears. Thank you, friend, I needed that.

Thanks for the vote of confidence.
{lang:macro__view_post}


You are aware that he was being sarcastic right? Whatever_anim.gif

QUOTE(dokimos0rg @ Feb 16 2006, 01:37 PM)
Rudeboy says to me in Runescape chat that Ultimate PKers Clan won't fight if allies come? 

All the UFF Movement clans are interjoined!  We are all about being allies! 

Some Ultimate PKers!  ROFL!

I say, they either face us or they change the name of their clan.
{lang:macro__view_post}


Oh, and I think it is pretty funny how you decide to insult all of the clans that decide they don't want to have almost every single person in their clan under level 40 Whatever_anim.gif Some people like to have experienced Runescape players in their clans so they can do more unique things, like, say, going to kill some big monster or something, instead of having 38490267 low levels complaining that they are too low level to even hit the big monster and would die in one hit, etc. So, really, this 'Fr33 cl4nning for allll! Let's go try to k1ll dudes who say they don't want people under level 50!?E1/ trF :O :O :O!" Seriously. It's pretty "gai".
{lang:macro__view_post}




Base has to warn you for degrading UFF now :O!
Posted Image
0

#24 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Darkness {lang:icon}

  • CHILDREN!
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 11,225
  • Joined: 12-April 03
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 06:44 AM

QUOTE(dokimos0rg @ Feb 16 2006, 06:00 PM)
Mr. Darkness, if you had been familiar with what UFF is about you wouldn't be posting such ignorance.

We are NOT saying wilderness teams should not have recommended levels.  It is about clanning.

UFF has had wilderness teams recommending certain levels or higher.  To do otherwise may create an unequal team in many circumstances.

Listen, Darkness, it is about CLANNING not PKING that we disapprove of resticted levels.  Get it?

Apparently you happen to like the idea of snuffy little clans of exclusive players.  So go ahead and join that if that's your personal thing.
{lang:macro__view_post}


Oh, yes. I'm quite aware of what UFF is about. Lovely homepage too, your nice images clash with the background in an almost awe inspiring way that makes one run to the toilet as fast as possible. But anyways... Yeah, Google is right. Wilderness teams pretty much are clans bluetongue.gif

Oh, no, not really. But I don't like the idea of haughty little clans full of people who think they must destroy any clan who doesn't want a clan full of low levels. It's like a twisted form of Pokemon or something. "Gotta beat them all! UFF!".

And I quit Runescape a while ago, so I don't really care much if you think I like 'snuffy lttle clans of exclusive players'. Either way, I do, in fact, think that those 'gai clubs' are a bit smarter than our lovely 'movement' to get rid of requirement clans.

By the way... You guys do know that just by killing a clan in the wilderness that you didn't destroy the clan, and they can still continue their "OMG WE WANT REQUIREMENTS"? You guys should. And you guys also know that even if you guys could somehow destroy all of the existing requirement clans that more would only spring up in their place? O.o

And why, exactly, did you name your website after you...? O.o

QUOTE(Callum Jacques Spartacus Liverot @ Feb 16 2006, 07:17 PM)
QUOTE(Darkness @ Feb 17 2006, 01:51 PM)
QUOTE(dokimos0rg @ Feb 12 2006, 05:24 PM)
QUOTE(Callum Jacques Spartacus Liverot @ Feb 11 2006, 12:29 AM)
You show that gai club how it's done thumb.gif
{lang:macro__view_post}



CJSL, when I read your post and saw your avatar I just laughed to tears. Thank you, friend, I needed that.

Thanks for the vote of confidence.
{lang:macro__view_post}


You are aware that he was being sarcastic right? Whatever_anim.gif

QUOTE(dokimos0rg @ Feb 16 2006, 01:37 PM)
Rudeboy says to me in Runescape chat that Ultimate PKers Clan won't fight if allies come? 

All the UFF Movement clans are interjoined!  We are all about being allies! 

Some Ultimate PKers!  ROFL!

I say, they either face us or they change the name of their clan.
{lang:macro__view_post}


Oh, and I think it is pretty funny how you decide to insult all of the clans that decide they don't want to have almost every single person in their clan under level 40 Whatever_anim.gif Some people like to have experienced Runescape players in their clans so they can do more unique things, like, say, going to kill some big monster or something, instead of having 38490267 low levels complaining that they are too low level to even hit the big monster and would die in one hit, etc. So, really, this 'Fr33 cl4nning for allll! Let's go try to k1ll dudes who say they don't want people under level 50!?E1/ trF :O :O :O!" Seriously. It's pretty "gai".
{lang:macro__view_post}




Base has to warn you for degrading UFF now :O!
{lang:macro__view_post}


NO WAI! >.<







“In the valley of hope, there is no winter.”

0

#25 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Jake {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 4,637
  • Joined: 24-October 04
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 11:52 AM

QUOTE
user posted image
Oh, yes. I'm quite aware of what UFF is about. Lovely homepage too, your nice images clash with the background in an almost awe inspiring way that makes one run to the toilet as fast as possible. But anyways... Yeah, Google is right. Wilderness teams pretty much are clans bluetongue.gif

Oh, no, not really. But I don't like the idea of haughty little clans full of people who think they must destroy any clan who doesn't want a clan full of low levels. It's like a twisted form of Pokemon or something. "Gotta beat them all! UFF!".

And I quit Runescape a while ago, so I don't really care much if you think I like 'snuffy lttle clans of exclusive players'. Either way, I do, in fact, think that those 'gai clubs' are a bit smarter than our lovely 'movement' to get rid of requirement clans.

By the way... You guys do know that just by killing a clan in the wilderness that you didn't destroy the clan, and they can still continue their "OMG WE WANT REQUIREMENTS"? You guys should. And you guys also know that even if you guys could somehow destroy all of the existing requirement clans that more would only spring up in their place? O.o

And why, exactly, did you name your website after you...? O.o
user posted image


dorry but...

user posted image
0

#26 {lang:macro__useroffline}   rudeboy2k5 {lang:icon}

  • ^its 2k6 now u idiot^
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 370
  • Joined: 19-November 05

Posted 17 February 2006 - 02:47 PM

We are having a bronze war the times are

Nohting apart frm bronze or robes

Times World 40 F2P

1:00 P.M. USA/Canada Pacific (GMT -8)
2:00 P.M. USA/Canada Mountain (GMT -7)
3:00 P.M. USA/Canada Central (GMT -6)
4:00 P.M. USA/Canada Eastern (GMT -5)
5:00 P.M. Canada Atlantic (GMT -4)
6:00 P.M. Greenland (GMT -3)
9:00 P.M. London/Dublin Greenwich Time (GMT)
10:00 P.M. Rome/Amsterdam (GMT +1)
11:00 P.M. Athens/Cairo (GMT +2)
12:00 A.M. Moscow (GMT +3) (Next Day)
1:00 A.M. Abu Dhabi/Baghdad (GMT +4) (Next Day)
4:00 A.M. Bangkok/Hanoi (GMT + 7) (Next Day)
5:00 A.M. Taipei/Beijing (GMT +8) (Next Day)
6:00 A.M. Tokyo, Seoul (GMT +9) (Next Day)
8:00 A.M. Australia (Sydney) (GMT +10) (Next Day)
10:00 A.M. Auckland/Wellington (GMT +12) (Next Day)

thats 18th - 19th for some

The war is tomorow. Who cares if they dont want u coming

and btw its rune wep's


0

#27 {lang:macro__useroffline}   dokimos0rg {lang:icon}

  • Visionary Founder of UFF
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 568
  • Joined: 15-November 05
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 02:52 PM

UFF values should be discussed in a seperate topic, not to distract from other topics. But as it is that I am in the role of visionary leader of the UFF Movement, I will reply to these refutations to our UFF cause.

The whole concept of clans exclusively for pking by exclusive levels is degenerative.

But if this is what they like to do, be a society unto themselves and cast insults on others who aren't up to snuff with their requirements, then they will continue to receive our response to expose them for what they really are.

"Cool" is NOT cool when cool is exclusive. That is what the use of the old word "gay" described in regard to social events, a move of exclusion.

We did not start the United Freedom Fighters Movement without expecting that we were going to get criticism for it. But it makes no difference anyway that we are criticised for it as we will be looked down on in any case. However, through United Freedom Fighters we have a united stance.

* * *

If clans don't like being called "gay" then they should have thought twice about thinking themselves as so cool to cut down those whom they deem below them on account of matters such as mere combat level.

Combat level does matter, but it does not define the character of the player, and is not good ground of itself to degrade another player. This is the biggest complaint that has been laid against Runescape.

Now the tables are turned. I do not pity the social elite of Runescape if they don't like it. They should never have taken such attitudes toward others if they didn't have the stomach to receive of the same.

We didn't start the fire. It should be noted that this indeed is a politically hot topic in Runescape. Granted, the Runescape Aristocrats would stand to lose their lofty reputation if our message were to become popular. But it is already too late for them, though. Already they have gained growing disrespect for their snobbery and it will continue to gain momentum.

* * *

Now, if discussion is desired to be posted in refute to the stance of the UFF Movement, I would like to ask that this be done in a seperate topic and in a respectful manner to the conventions of SeeD Forum.


This post has been edited by dokimos0rg: 17 February 2006 - 03:00 PM

user posted imageuser posted image
0

#28 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Jake {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 4,637
  • Joined: 24-October 04
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 09:16 PM

QUOTE(dokimos0rg @ Feb 17 2006, 08:52 AM)
UFF values should be discussed in a seperate topic, not to distract from other topics.  But as it is that I am in the role of visionary leader of the UFF Movement, I will reply to these refutations to our UFF cause.

The whole concept of clans exclusively for pking by exclusive levels is degenerative.

But if this is what they like to do, be a society unto themselves and cast insults on others who aren't up to snuff with their requirements, then they will continue to receive our response to expose them for what they really are.

"Cool" is NOT cool when cool is exclusive.  That is what the use of the old word "gay" described in regard to social events, a move of exclusion.

We did not start the United Freedom Fighters Movement without expecting that we were going to get criticism for it.  But it makes no difference anyway that we are criticised for it as we will be looked down on in any case.  However, through United Freedom Fighters we have a united stance. 

* * *

If clans don't like being called "gay" then they should have thought twice about thinking themselves as so cool to cut down those whom they deem below them on account of matters such as mere combat level.

Combat level does matter, but it does not define the character of the player, and is not good ground of itself to degrade another player.  This is the biggest complaint that has been laid against Runescape. 

Now the tables are turned.  I do not pity the social elite of Runescape if they don't like it.  They should never have taken such attitudes toward others if they didn't have the stomach to receive of the same.

We didn't start the fire.  It should be noted that this indeed is a politically hot topic in Runescape.  Granted, the Runescape Aristocrats would stand to lose their lofty reputation if our message were to become popular.  But it is already too late for them, though.  Already they have gained growing disrespect for their snobbery and it will continue to gain momentum.

* * *

Now, if discussion is desired to be posted in refute to the stance of the UFF Movement, I would like to ask that this be done in a seperate topic and in a respectful manner to the conventions of SeeD Forum.
{lang:macro__view_post}



okie dokie i can at least respect the other topic part... TO THE OTHER TOPIC! AWAY!
0

#29 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Skyone {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 4,310
  • Joined: 01-October 05
  • Location:uk

Posted 17 February 2006 - 09:24 PM

So were all going to have to wear bronze???...but can we also use rune wepons like skimmy and r2h???
0

#30 {lang:macro__useroffline}   rudeboy2k5 {lang:icon}

  • ^its 2k6 now u idiot^
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 370
  • Joined: 19-November 05

Posted 17 February 2006 - 11:39 PM

thts correct
0

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • {lang:pm_locked} This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users