UFF movement Vs Ultimate Pkers ^^^^^
#16
Posted 14 February 2006 - 08:21 PM
#18
Posted 16 February 2006 - 09:37 PM
All the UFF Movement clans are interjoined! We are all about being allies!
Some Ultimate PKers! ROFL!
I say, they either face us or they change the name of their clan.
#20
Posted 17 February 2006 - 12:51 AM
CJSL, when I read your post and saw your avatar I just laughed to tears. Thank you, friend, I needed that.
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
You are aware that he was being sarcastic right?

All the UFF Movement clans are interjoined! We are all about being allies!
Some Ultimate PKers! ROFL!
I say, they either face us or they change the name of their clan.
Oh, and I think it is pretty funny how you decide to insult all of the clans that decide they don't want to have almost every single person in their clan under level 40


























“In the valley of hope, there is no winter.”
#21
Posted 17 February 2006 - 02:00 AM
We are NOT saying wilderness teams should not have recommended levels. It is about clanning.
UFF has had wilderness teams recommending certain levels or higher. To do otherwise may create an unequal team in many circumstances.
Listen, Darkness, it is about CLANNING not PKING that we disapprove of resticted levels. Get it?
Apparently you happen to like the idea of snuffy little clans of exclusive players. So go ahead and join that if that's your personal thing.
#22
Posted 17 February 2006 - 02:56 AM
why do you hate clans with any reqs at all?
and dont call them "gai clubs"
call them noobs or something... it dosent make you look as bad
(i know a mod is probably gonna tell me to stfu but im not flaming him... you would know it if I was)
This post has been edited by Googlebot™: 17 February 2006 - 02:57 AM
#23
Posted 17 February 2006 - 03:17 AM
CJSL, when I read your post and saw your avatar I just laughed to tears. Thank you, friend, I needed that.
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
You are aware that he was being sarcastic right?

All the UFF Movement clans are interjoined! We are all about being allies!
Some Ultimate PKers! ROFL!
I say, they either face us or they change the name of their clan.
Oh, and I think it is pretty funny how you decide to insult all of the clans that decide they don't want to have almost every single person in their clan under level 40

Base has to warn you for degrading UFF now :O!

#24
Posted 17 February 2006 - 06:44 AM
We are NOT saying wilderness teams should not have recommended levels. It is about clanning.
UFF has had wilderness teams recommending certain levels or higher. To do otherwise may create an unequal team in many circumstances.
Listen, Darkness, it is about CLANNING not PKING that we disapprove of resticted levels. Get it?
Apparently you happen to like the idea of snuffy little clans of exclusive players. So go ahead and join that if that's your personal thing.
Oh, yes. I'm quite aware of what UFF is about. Lovely homepage too, your nice images clash with the background in an almost awe inspiring way that makes one run to the toilet as fast as possible. But anyways... Yeah, Google is right. Wilderness teams pretty much are clans

Oh, no, not really. But I don't like the idea of haughty little clans full of people who think they must destroy any clan who doesn't want a clan full of low levels. It's like a twisted form of Pokemon or something. "Gotta beat them all! UFF!".
And I quit Runescape a while ago, so I don't really care much if you think I like 'snuffy lttle clans of exclusive players'. Either way, I do, in fact, think that those 'gai clubs' are a bit smarter than our lovely 'movement' to get rid of requirement clans.
By the way... You guys do know that just by killing a clan in the wilderness that you didn't destroy the clan, and they can still continue their "OMG WE WANT REQUIREMENTS"? You guys should. And you guys also know that even if you guys could somehow destroy all of the existing requirement clans that more would only spring up in their place? O.o
And why, exactly, did you name your website after you...? O.o
CJSL, when I read your post and saw your avatar I just laughed to tears. Thank you, friend, I needed that.
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
You are aware that he was being sarcastic right?

All the UFF Movement clans are interjoined! We are all about being allies!
Some Ultimate PKers! ROFL!
I say, they either face us or they change the name of their clan.
Oh, and I think it is pretty funny how you decide to insult all of the clans that decide they don't want to have almost every single person in their clan under level 40

Base has to warn you for degrading UFF now :O!
NO WAI! >.<

























“In the valley of hope, there is no winter.”
#25
Posted 17 February 2006 - 11:52 AM

Oh, yes. I'm quite aware of what UFF is about. Lovely homepage too, your nice images clash with the background in an almost awe inspiring way that makes one run to the toilet as fast as possible. But anyways... Yeah, Google is right. Wilderness teams pretty much are clans bluetongue.gif
Oh, no, not really. But I don't like the idea of haughty little clans full of people who think they must destroy any clan who doesn't want a clan full of low levels. It's like a twisted form of Pokemon or something. "Gotta beat them all! UFF!".
And I quit Runescape a while ago, so I don't really care much if you think I like 'snuffy lttle clans of exclusive players'. Either way, I do, in fact, think that those 'gai clubs' are a bit smarter than our lovely 'movement' to get rid of requirement clans.
By the way... You guys do know that just by killing a clan in the wilderness that you didn't destroy the clan, and they can still continue their "OMG WE WANT REQUIREMENTS"? You guys should. And you guys also know that even if you guys could somehow destroy all of the existing requirement clans that more would only spring up in their place? O.o
And why, exactly, did you name your website after you...? O.o

dorry but...

#26
Posted 17 February 2006 - 02:47 PM
Nohting apart frm bronze or robes
Times World 40 F2P
1:00 P.M. USA/Canada Pacific (GMT -8)
2:00 P.M. USA/Canada Mountain (GMT -7)
3:00 P.M. USA/Canada Central (GMT -6)
4:00 P.M. USA/Canada Eastern (GMT -5)
5:00 P.M. Canada Atlantic (GMT -4)
6:00 P.M. Greenland (GMT -3)
9:00 P.M. London/Dublin Greenwich Time (GMT)
10:00 P.M. Rome/Amsterdam (GMT +1)
11:00 P.M. Athens/Cairo (GMT +2)
12:00 A.M. Moscow (GMT +3) (Next Day)
1:00 A.M. Abu Dhabi/Baghdad (GMT +4) (Next Day)
4:00 A.M. Bangkok/Hanoi (GMT + 7) (Next Day)
5:00 A.M. Taipei/Beijing (GMT +8) (Next Day)
6:00 A.M. Tokyo, Seoul (GMT +9) (Next Day)
8:00 A.M. Australia (Sydney) (GMT +10) (Next Day)
10:00 A.M. Auckland/Wellington (GMT +12) (Next Day)
thats 18th - 19th for some
The war is tomorow. Who cares if they dont want u coming
and btw its rune wep's
#27
Posted 17 February 2006 - 02:52 PM
The whole concept of clans exclusively for pking by exclusive levels is degenerative.
But if this is what they like to do, be a society unto themselves and cast insults on others who aren't up to snuff with their requirements, then they will continue to receive our response to expose them for what they really are.
"Cool" is NOT cool when cool is exclusive. That is what the use of the old word "gay" described in regard to social events, a move of exclusion.
We did not start the United Freedom Fighters Movement without expecting that we were going to get criticism for it. But it makes no difference anyway that we are criticised for it as we will be looked down on in any case. However, through United Freedom Fighters we have a united stance.
* * *
If clans don't like being called "gay" then they should have thought twice about thinking themselves as so cool to cut down those whom they deem below them on account of matters such as mere combat level.
Combat level does matter, but it does not define the character of the player, and is not good ground of itself to degrade another player. This is the biggest complaint that has been laid against Runescape.
Now the tables are turned. I do not pity the social elite of Runescape if they don't like it. They should never have taken such attitudes toward others if they didn't have the stomach to receive of the same.
We didn't start the fire. It should be noted that this indeed is a politically hot topic in Runescape. Granted, the Runescape Aristocrats would stand to lose their lofty reputation if our message were to become popular. But it is already too late for them, though. Already they have gained growing disrespect for their snobbery and it will continue to gain momentum.
* * *
Now, if discussion is desired to be posted in refute to the stance of the UFF Movement, I would like to ask that this be done in a seperate topic and in a respectful manner to the conventions of SeeD Forum.
This post has been edited by dokimos0rg: 17 February 2006 - 03:00 PM
#28
Posted 17 February 2006 - 09:16 PM
The whole concept of clans exclusively for pking by exclusive levels is degenerative.
But if this is what they like to do, be a society unto themselves and cast insults on others who aren't up to snuff with their requirements, then they will continue to receive our response to expose them for what they really are.
"Cool" is NOT cool when cool is exclusive. That is what the use of the old word "gay" described in regard to social events, a move of exclusion.
We did not start the United Freedom Fighters Movement without expecting that we were going to get criticism for it. But it makes no difference anyway that we are criticised for it as we will be looked down on in any case. However, through United Freedom Fighters we have a united stance.
* * *
If clans don't like being called "gay" then they should have thought twice about thinking themselves as so cool to cut down those whom they deem below them on account of matters such as mere combat level.
Combat level does matter, but it does not define the character of the player, and is not good ground of itself to degrade another player. This is the biggest complaint that has been laid against Runescape.
Now the tables are turned. I do not pity the social elite of Runescape if they don't like it. They should never have taken such attitudes toward others if they didn't have the stomach to receive of the same.
We didn't start the fire. It should be noted that this indeed is a politically hot topic in Runescape. Granted, the Runescape Aristocrats would stand to lose their lofty reputation if our message were to become popular. But it is already too late for them, though. Already they have gained growing disrespect for their snobbery and it will continue to gain momentum.
* * *
Now, if discussion is desired to be posted in refute to the stance of the UFF Movement, I would like to ask that this be done in a seperate topic and in a respectful manner to the conventions of SeeD Forum.
okie dokie i can at least respect the other topic part... TO THE OTHER TOPIC! AWAY!
#30
Posted 17 February 2006 - 11:39 PM