Posted 01 July 2004 - 01:30 AM
QUOTE |
I don't exactly see SeeD as a democracy... I only see moderators, super moderators and admins with power, no members have any power as far as I'm concerned. |
Every single feature of importance in the clan except our original organizational system was either suggested by a member or voted to be included by the members. We do add things here and there that would not hurt anyone (mostly aspects of the site and forums), but no major changes are made without the clan (and a lot of the time are brought about by the clan). Forums are often requested and added, the Garden system was updated due to complaints regarding inactive members and loose organization, events are completely in the hands of the members, we provide countless leadership opportunities to everyone including the self-appointable position as the leader of a mercenary group (of which the system was voted for), we organized an "army" from the clan's concerns regarding preparedness for war, the Mod Appeal board was added to allow members to express concerns regarding moderation (as well as request it in topics), we have few guidelines on signatures or other profile information (including the ability for everyone to change their member title, unlike many boards), and many other chances for members to either express themselves or actually make changes. If you suggest something it will always be considered and we do not stop anyone from doing anything unless it will somehow hurt someone.
I understand what you are saying regarding the past months with the Rebels though, but you would have to see that our plan was carefully thought-out and agreed upon by Gunblade and our leaders to provide for the clan's interests. We provided pressure to help them change and benefit themselves as well as us (for even if anyone won a war their clan would follow the same path as it had, they just did not trust us so it happened earlier). If we went to war we could have quite a situation right now because it would keep going, and it would prevent us from being able to accomplish any goals that we are now capable of pursuing. The situation with them has ended, it is just that they ended it for themselves in a way which was not intended.
QUOTE |
SeeD *is* what the leaders make it. It's what they choose to do in a conflict, they choose to do in their own life which affects what happens on our forums. It's if they choose to take action on something that's happened, they choose to ban a member for something they've done. That iks what makes SeeD. |
We remain neutral and try not to ban anyone unless necessary. A ban is a temporary fix, it makes the problem go away until the banishment is over or the member overrides it. When that happens it is often magnified, so we try to have everyone try to solve their own problems or support their friends, and if necessary the mediators and others will try to solve them before resorting to such measures as a ban. If everyone were able to solve their own problems or support one another in certain situations no action would be necessary for the mediators or anyone else. This is very difficult to achieve (everyone is human) but we are trying regardless of how difficult it may be, and this is why "banishment requests" are looked down upon and we try to solve the problems before they magnify and hurt anyone.
QUOTE |
We haven't succeeded with ending our conflicts but we have strengthened from them. That it how I'd rephrase it to. I know some people think there's no more conflicts, or I know some people like to think it that way, but personally I still see a lot of conflicts, one of which I'm in the middle of right now ,and which the leaders will probably do something about soon. |
If someone is in your situation, he/she can solve the conflict on his/her own without worrying about such things (as long as a method is not being used which would create a conflict, such as by flaming or "proof of wrongs" to get someone to look bad to others or retaliate).
QUOTE |
We have to be the 'straightened up robot people' SeeD, not the SeeD which has fun by saying things they really mean, and posting things they really want to say. |
You can say anything that is not directly (or sarcastically) harmful to anyone, only then would a moderator do something about it. Moderators are like webmasters, they cannot tell you what to think but they can manage what the site is used for and if anyone abuses it. In this case we prohibit any obscene content or direct flaming, but not the speaking of anyone's mind.
If you are against something you don't need to come out and say "this is stupid" (or whatever). Instead, many members have voiced their opinions in ways which do not harm anyone and they are not looked down upon for it. By reading many of such responses, I have found that if you include a general statement of the problem, an idea to solve or improve it, and a compliment for one's intentions, you will never have it taken the wrong way if it has a purpose.
QUOTE |
Remember the "Peacekeepers of Runescape" idea? I do, and I haven't actually seen ANYTHING come from it at all... The legion forum in inactive, same goes for the clan mediators, which I don't find to be effective anyway. |
I said that we have started off slowly but are picking up, and the situation with the Rebels and other minor problems hindered its progress. Mediators have nothing to do with the idea.
QUOTE |
No longer will members necessarily leave because they lose interest in Runescape. No, they'll leave because of the inactivity in their games forum. |
They don't have to devote themselves to one game, they can be full members in Runescape and have an event now and then in Counter Strike when they are in the mood. Those who leave Runescape can give SeeD a go in other games and practically start clans with the support of SeeD.
QUOTE |
And some of the 'leaders' don't even post in there |
We don't have any leaders there yet.
QUOTE |
and everyone who joins the SeeD's in other games gets bored quicker than if they were playing Runescape. |
Who says they can't play Runescape?
QUOTE |
If SeeD was my ideal clan, I can tell you a lot of things would be different, things which I can't change at the moment, even though the members supposedly steer this clan |
I have not seen any recent ideas sent via PM nor posted, and unless you state your ideas they will never be implemented unless brought up by someone else because we will not know of them.
QUOTE |
Anyway, we will be entering a new period. And this changes...what...? Nothing, it's just a little name, no need to make a fuss over it. |
I don't see anything being harmed by it.
I know that it may seem that in a clan of our size members cannot make a difference, but this is not the case in SeeD. Just about every aspect of our organization and about 3/4 of the site was either brought up by a member, approved by a majority vote, or brought about purely in the clan's interest from common situations and concerns. The leaders spend many hours every week making it possible for this to exist (like with the site and allowing us to grow and pursue SeeD's goals), and that's really about it. When a member speaks up about something it often makes a change or brings about other ideas which do affect how things really work here. You just need to speak up and we will consider your ideas, and unless hindering with something else we will do what is in the clan's interest.