Sparks sig signature
#9
Posted 08 April 2005 - 07:51 PM
Both of you, calm down. Obviously, one of you have to be the more mature person and stop this before it gets out of hand. Red, it wasn't right for you to attack him when he thought he was doing it right, and Mobster, it wasn't right to attack him when you found out he was wrong.
EDIT: I sent Sparks a PM regarding his sig size.
EDIT: I sent Sparks a PM regarding his sig size.
This post has been edited by Darkness: 08 April 2005 - 07:58 PM

























“In the valley of hope, there is no winter.”
#14
Posted 08 April 2005 - 11:48 PM
QUOTE(Mobster101 @ Apr 8 2005, 12:25 PM)
ohh, thought iread where soemone said to post here...oopsy! sorry red didn't reolize these were your forums....jeesh 

Didn't want to bug you about it...But technically...It is his forums...It's also my forums, your forums, and everyone else's forums...We share it all together like a family. There's a World War II Quote I rather like that defines this.
QUOTE
A soldier has two families. One that he raises, and one that he raises hell with.
I see SeeD as the one I raise hell with. ^_^ And some even have their other families to raise.
---Ruckus the Rogue
#15
Posted 09 April 2005 - 12:42 AM
Errr... Quite, Ruckus.
It's a bit of a gray area. My recommendation would be that 9/10 times the best thing to do would be to PM the member and politely suggest it might be a bit large. That way things get resolved without them having to be mentioned by name on the boards, and everybody is happy. If they don't respond, PMing a super mod about it might be a good thing to try.
The rule people were thinking of was not to mention a moderator by name, it's actually referring to the role this forum normally takes, which is somewhere members can say they disagree with a particular piece of moderation. It's to try and stop it turning into a blaming match everytime something happens. I can understand that some people might not like to be mentioned in Mod Appeal for something like this, too.
However to my knowledge posting something like this here is not wrong, as it's perfectly legitimate to post here with moderation you think has been overlooked. It'd just usually be simpler and nicer if you ask the member via PM instead.

It's a bit of a gray area. My recommendation would be that 9/10 times the best thing to do would be to PM the member and politely suggest it might be a bit large. That way things get resolved without them having to be mentioned by name on the boards, and everybody is happy. If they don't respond, PMing a super mod about it might be a good thing to try.
The rule people were thinking of was not to mention a moderator by name, it's actually referring to the role this forum normally takes, which is somewhere members can say they disagree with a particular piece of moderation. It's to try and stop it turning into a blaming match everytime something happens. I can understand that some people might not like to be mentioned in Mod Appeal for something like this, too.
However to my knowledge posting something like this here is not wrong, as it's perfectly legitimate to post here with moderation you think has been overlooked. It'd just usually be simpler and nicer if you ask the member via PM instead.