[it is I and I is me]

But he graduated, didnt he?

[frty12345]

haha yah so what? his dad owns oil. he has alot of $$$. he has big time $$$. hes a stupid cheat. he is so stupid lol. kerry went to vietnam to fite the communist threat while bush hide behind his dads $$$. kerry is and will always be way betta. and hillary does not want to ban violent video games.

[it is I and I is me]

Well it isn't exactly like Kerry grew up in the ghetto.

[frty12345]

Well it isn't exactly like Kerry grew up in the ghetto.

why u fitin me neway? u shouldnt care about american polotics if ur not american.

[it is I and I is me]

Not fighting, debating.

And since America is the most powerful country in the world right now, what America does affects the rest of the world.

[frty12345]

Not fighting, debating.

And since America is the most powerful country in the world right now, what America does affects the rest of the world.

i will win then. let me device a huge speech u will have to face and bfr u know it u will be on ur knees sayin ive won. i own all!

[it is I and I is me]

I said right now.

In 10-20 years time it might not be.

We might all be speaking Korean then. Who knows.

[frty12345]

I said right now.

In 10-20 years time it might not be.

We might all be speaking Korean then. Who knows.

hahah really?


someone has casued nothing but trouble for the past 5 years for the united nations. he has made a faulty law called no child left behind. he has invaded iraq with no cause. he had no cause to invade the iraqi people. there was no so called "wepons of mass destruction." he picked a very bad MISTAKE for a repusentive in the un. who is this someone. its pres bush


beat that!

[Crescens]

A few clarifications:

Neither Bush nor Kerry did very well at Yale. This is because Yale is an extremely hard school to do well in. It does not imply that either is stupid.

Even though this isn't a real debate (or it'd be in the Debate Forum), it might still be wise to make your argument intelligible and logical, rather than simply utilizing propaganda and using petty generalities to support your views. "Arnold Schwarzenegger is gay." Honestly. How would that help your argument? In any case, one who is so devoutly anti-Republican and pro-Democrat ought to be in favor of gay marriage as well, an ideal of the Democratic party. However, your argument clearly contradicts this ideal.

Well, frankly I have no idea. All I know is that Bush is the worst.

You admit that you know nothing, then state you know that Bush is the worst. Based on what? I'm not attacking your views, as you're entitled to them, simply asking for you to provide justification in what you say.

More clarifications!
- Purple Heart awards can be awarded for injuries as meager as shaving scars. They do not imply heroism in warfare.
- The papers about Bush's National Guard record were proven to be forgeries. Yet the media was still able to do its damage in that people still believe the information contained in such forgeries to be fact. Power of the press.
- Hilary Clinton does want to ban violent video games. She has made a stand against Grand Theft Auto, not because it involves robbing banks, raping prostitutes, and doing other oh-so-noble things to teach people to do, but simply because it is violent.

I can see that the deranged minds of (a) certain individual(s) will not be swayed by attempts at reason. However, I'm making a sincere effort to ask people to question things before they shout such devotion to a cause. Utter and unquestioning devotion is what caused the travesties of the Holocaust and the Rape of Nanking. Let such catastrophes not repeat themselves.

[frty12345]

A few clarifications:

Neither Bush nor Kerry did very well at Yale. This is because Yale is an extremely hard school to do well in. It does not imply that either is stupid.

Even though this isn't a real debate (or it'd be in the Debate Forum), it might still be wise to make your argument intelligible and logical, rather than simply utilizing propaganda and using petty generalities to support your views. "Arnold Schwarzenegger is gay." Honestly. How would that help your argument? In any case, one who is so devoutly anti-Republican and pro-Democrat ought to be in favor of gay marriage as well, an ideal of the Democratic party. However, your argument clearly contradicts this ideal.

Well, frankly I have no idea. All I know is that Bush is the worst.

You admit that you know nothing, then state you know that Bush is the worst. Based on what? I'm not attacking your views, as you're entitled to them, simply asking for you to provide justification in what you say.

More clarifications!
- Purple Heart awards can be awarded for injuries as meager as shaving scars. They do not imply heroism in warfare.
- The papers about Bush's National Guard record were proven to be forgeries. Yet the media was still able to do its damage in that people still believe the information contained in such forgeries to be fact. Power of the press.
- Hilary Clinton does want to ban violent video games. She has made a stand against Grand Theft Auto, not because it involves robbing banks, raping prostitutes, and doing other oh-so-noble things to teach people to do, but simply because it is violent.

I can see that the deranged minds of (a) certain individual(s) will not be swayed by attempts at reason. However, I'm making a sincere effort to ask people to question things before they shout such devotion to a cause. Utter and unquestioning devotion is what caused the travesties of the Holocaust and the Rape of Nanking. Let such catastrophes not repeat themselves.

omg man he was shot! and stabed! he has pruople heart fr bein a man unlike bush!

wana debate with me too....i am smart even tho i talk dumb. i will gurrante that i will beat everyone who tries to debate with me

[Crescens]

Congratulations to all those overly devoted to left-wing liberal extremism; this is the type of fanatic you rub shoulders with. Be proud.

Given that you failed to address nearly all of the points I made, and the only point you did address was addressed quite rudely. I "gurante" that I would not "wana" debate with someone as fanatical and irrational as you. If you wish to display your intellect, prove it by not allowing emotion to so easily overwhelm rational thought and stating your views in an appropriate and respectful manner. Is that truly so difficult for one of your prestigious self-proclaimed intellect?

I'm not saying that people are not entitled to the views of liberalism. The mere fact that we live in a society where people can have differing views from one another illustrates the progressive nature of society. What I oppose, in essence, is people who are so overly devoted (to either dominant American political ideology) that they allow their own rational thought to be skewed by such devotion.

[frty12345]

Congratulations to all those overly devoted to left-wing liberal extremism; this is the type of fanatic you rub shoulders with. Be proud.

Given that you failed to address nearly all of the points I made, and the only point you did address was addressed quite rudely. I "gurante" that I would not "wana" debate with someone as fanatical and irrational as you. If you wish to display your intellect, prove it by not allowing emotion to so easily overwhelm rational thought and stating your views in an appropriate and respectful manner. Is that truly so difficult for one of your prestigious self-proclaimed intellect?

I'm not saying that people are not entitled to the views of liberalism. The mere fact that we live in a society where people can have differing views from one another illustrates the progressive nature of society. What I oppose, in essence, is people who are so overly devoted (to either dominant American political ideology) that they allow their own rational thought to be skewed by such devotion.

k sorry about that that wasnt me man. that was my stupid little brother. well bush is quiet dumb sir. dont debate with my little brother hes to easy. debate with the REAL frty12345. i gurrante this will be fun

[pug1231]

yes i agree with you frty12345 demacrats rule and i am one my self and bush is kenndys pet retarted monkey!ha beat that republicans oh and arnold is carters pet wezzel who drank stair roids and turned to a hairless retarted mole rat beat that suckers!ha bush should be flushed down the and arnold to!

[it is I and I is me]

I think frty and pug are the same person

[Baseballl]

Yeah they are the same person.

I'm not going to debate you here since you made an "I hate Bush" post in the Study Hall, so I'll debate there. One thing I do want to point out here is ignorance. I totally agree with Regulus, so I won't need to repeat him or whatever. If you want to debate a president, you need to use evidence and take different stands on issues. You can't say Bush sucks because you don't like his "No Child Left Behind" act. I'm a democrat and I guess you could say I'm a conservative democrat. I do back up Bush because he is my president, but I can also disagree with some of his beliefs. I'm not the person to sit and say I hate someone because I disagree with a few of his beliefs.

You also need to understand that the president has little to no control over the economy and doesn't make decisions on his own. He has little authority in the government. Congress and the Senate run this country and when you understand that, you will be able to debate. Also, don't be a reneger on your arguments by saying it was your brother and don't make alt accounts to comment on your own post.