lead spokesman for the taliban a student at yale
#16
Posted 05 March 2006 - 02:55 AM
Michael Savage is a hotheaded retard.
While I do admit people of Arabic descent are usually the ones involved in jihadist acts, the participants in the London bombings were of all races.
While I do admit people of Arabic descent are usually the ones involved in jihadist acts, the participants in the London bombings were of all races.
Shake: I'm on TV a lot. This is my sitcom, with the--
Shake (On TV): I'm in your house.
Shake:...
Meatwad:...
Shake: With the sci-fi horror twist.
Shake (On TV): I'm in your house.
Shake:...
Meatwad:...
Shake: With the sci-fi horror twist.
#17
Posted 05 March 2006 - 07:58 AM
QUOTE(jbg9 @ Mar 4 2006, 10:26 AM)
QUOTE(Elvenblader5 @ Mar 4 2006, 01:38 AM)
QUOTE(bespetna @ Mar 1 2006, 04:10 PM)
By raising a red flag do you mean why was he allowed into the U.S. at all? Answer is becouse he had a visa to come to the U.S.A.
PS: not all people that live in the middle wast are bad people that whant to distroy the world!
PS: not all people that live in the middle wast are bad people that whant to distroy the world!
What I meant by that he raised any red flags is the government will watch certain races and people who may pose a threat to the government and national security. It's crap if you ask me, the government did something similar back in the 1940's with people who were Japanese. On the west coast they forced Japanese people ut of their homes and into to internment camps. And in those camps they were crammed in like sardines and had little room. It wasnt until after the war were these people let go. A from of racism by our government on the west coast. And what was even worse was there were Japanese sons fighting in the US Navy at the time. So yeah it's really messed up.
But my point is our government will watch people and political parties that are very influential and will keep an eye on them to see if they are a threat to national security. It's not that this guy was singled out but that he suppports Osama Bin Laden that they will keep an eye on him. As Thomas Jefferson said, "The prices of freedom is constant vigilance."
About that Japanese internment camp thing: It was completely neccessary. We were at war. And we were fighting the most dificult war we ever had, and against a very formidable enemy with millions and millions of Japanese civilians who would fight and die for their emporer.
You must understand that before the attack on Pearl Harbour, there were Japanese in Hawaii that were spying on our ships. That is one reason why their attack was so successful. We literally had an "enemy within" as Michael Savage puts it. They could have signaled to enemy ships if it came to it or who knows what.
That's crap, it was not necessary and people shouldnt have to be put into internment camps. The internment camp thing only happened on the west coast and it was very prejudice. The only real basis for the internment camps was Pearl Harbor and the fear that anyone of Japanese or Asian descent was with the axis powers. If you want to put it that way you might as well as lock everyone up who is of Asian descent or Arabian descent and say, "We're sorry you might be a terrorist so we cant trust you until this whole thing blows over."

This post has been edited by Elvenblader5: 05 March 2006 - 08:00 AM
#18
Posted 05 March 2006 - 08:06 AM
QUOTE(Elvenblader5 @ Mar 5 2006, 08:58 PM)
QUOTE(jbg9 @ Mar 4 2006, 10:26 AM)
QUOTE(Elvenblader5 @ Mar 4 2006, 01:38 AM)
QUOTE(bespetna @ Mar 1 2006, 04:10 PM)
By raising a red flag do you mean why was he allowed into the U.S. at all? Answer is becouse he had a visa to come to the U.S.A.
PS: not all people that live in the middle wast are bad people that whant to distroy the world!
PS: not all people that live in the middle wast are bad people that whant to distroy the world!
What I meant by that he raised any red flags is the government will watch certain races and people who may pose a threat to the government and national security. It's crap if you ask me, the government did something similar back in the 1940's with people who were Japanese. On the west coast they forced Japanese people ut of their homes and into to internment camps. And in those camps they were crammed in like sardines and had little room. It wasnt until after the war were these people let go. A from of racism by our government on the west coast. And what was even worse was there were Japanese sons fighting in the US Navy at the time. So yeah it's really messed up.
But my point is our government will watch people and political parties that are very influential and will keep an eye on them to see if they are a threat to national security. It's not that this guy was singled out but that he suppports Osama Bin Laden that they will keep an eye on him. As Thomas Jefferson said, "The prices of freedom is constant vigilance."
About that Japanese internment camp thing: It was completely neccessary. We were at war. And we were fighting the most dificult war we ever had, and against a very formidable enemy with millions and millions of Japanese civilians who would fight and die for their emporer.
You must understand that before the attack on Pearl Harbour, there were Japanese in Hawaii that were spying on our ships. That is one reason why their attack was so successful. We literally had an "enemy within" as Michael Savage puts it. They could have signaled to enemy ships if it came to it or who knows what.
That's crap, it was not necessary and people shouldnt have to be put into internment camps. The internment camp thing only happened on the west coast and it was very prejudice. The only real basis for the internment camps was Pearl Harbor and the fear that anyone of Japanese or Asian descent was with the axis powers. If you want to put it that way you might as well as lock everyone up who is of Asian descent or Arabian descent and say, "We're sorry you might be a terrorist so we cant trust you until this whole thing blows over."

++

#19
Posted 05 March 2006 - 05:14 PM
#26
Posted 06 March 2006 - 06:08 PM
There is no justifiable reasons for locking up the Arabic and Islamic people just because we're at a war. Because of this pointless war against terrorism we are draining the economy and wasting money on useless munitions and operations that could be further better to be put to use in more constructive ways, instead of bombing the living crap out of a country. George Bush is an idiot that had no reason to stick his nose where it didnt belong in the first place. I agree that the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks were one of the worst attacks since Pearl Harbor. But because of bad intel and poor preparation we went into a country that possibly had nothing to do with the funding or the preparatin of the World Trade Center Attacks. If it was up to me I would freaking hang the s.o.b. that decided to attack innocent people and cost our country greatly. But sadly I cant.
This post has been edited by Elvenblader5: 06 March 2006 - 06:08 PM
#27
Posted 06 March 2006 - 09:43 PM
QUOTE(jbg9 @ Mar 5 2006, 11:40 PM)
Are you an idiot or something?
Shake: I'm on TV a lot. This is my sitcom, with the--
Shake (On TV): I'm in your house.
Shake:...
Meatwad:...
Shake: With the sci-fi horror twist.
Shake (On TV): I'm in your house.
Shake:...
Meatwad:...
Shake: With the sci-fi horror twist.