CurvedSpace Forums: Runescape Ranking Change - CurvedSpace Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Runescape Ranking Change Please Vote if interested

Poll: Which shall take place?

Which shall take place?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Ratty {lang:icon}

  • Bigrat2
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 10,910
  • Joined: 01-October 03

Posted 30 November 2004 - 05:56 AM

Hiya guys,

Ive had a few people ask me if people were going to be removed from Highscores if theyre inactive and dont go on runescape any more, So i thought id ask for everyones opinion TheSmile.gif

If the option of removing people in inactive is chosen, What ill be doing is, changing the ** (for inactive) to *(inactive 1 week), **(inactive 2 weeks) and ***(inactive 3 weeks), And if they still dont gain experience after the 3rd week, they will be removed.

I dont really have a problem with them being there, as its not much work keeping them there, But if people feel they should be taken down, so its a list of active people, then it will be done TheSmile.gif

Note: Only reason i considered this was because of the New Highest Levels Threads which only have Active people, Might just do the same here

Thanks guys TheSmile.gif

-BR2

EDIT: i personally would vote no, But since a few people asked me, i thought id bring it up to everyone to decide TheSmile.gif
Empty sig is empty.
0

#2 {lang:macro__useroffline}   cjjones {lang:icon}

  • WoW > j00
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1,338
  • Joined: 26-May 03
  • Location:Australia

Posted 30 November 2004 - 06:01 AM

Maybe just remove people if they ask to be because they quit or something...
0

#3 {lang:macro__useroffline}   ©allum {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 7,194
  • Joined: 21-July 03
  • Location:Australia

Posted 30 November 2004 - 06:15 AM

Nah, I don't think people should be removed.
Posted Image
0

#4 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Neraphym {lang:icon}

  • Do not want!
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 10,332
  • Joined: 29-October 03
  • Location:Australia

Posted 30 November 2004 - 11:37 AM

I dont really care either way, but if you do remove people from inactivity, make it 2 months and not 3 weeks.
Neraphym Archaeon
Posted Image
GWAMM
0

#5 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Star Jedi {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_gallery}
  • Group: Community Admin
  • Posts: 5,684
  • Joined: 01-May 03
  • Location:Australia

Posted 01 December 2004 - 09:31 PM

QUOTE(Alpha Weapon @ Nov 30 2004, 06:37 AM)
I dont really care either way, but if you do remove people from inactivity, make it 2 months and not 3 weeks.
{lang:macro__view_post}


^Ditto^ And if they want back on, all they have to do is askness.
0

#6 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Daryl C {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,487
  • Joined: 27-October 03
  • Location:Australia

Posted 02 December 2004 - 01:33 AM

I think that people should be removed who are not active for 3 weeks...i think it gives a much better report of who is "IN" seed at the current point in time
0

#7 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Raktor {lang:icon}

  • Official SeeD Alcoholic
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 4,013
  • Joined: 30-August 03
  • Location:Australia

Posted 02 December 2004 - 02:41 AM

I think it should be three weeks, with exceptions (Like Final, for example).

And I think it should be made in a new thread, so bigrat can edit it in without getting supermods to do it for him grnwink.gif
0

#8 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Neraphym {lang:icon}

  • Do not want!
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 10,332
  • Joined: 29-October 03
  • Location:Australia

Posted 03 December 2004 - 03:20 PM

Because a lot of us take occasional breaks from RS, removing then adding them again can be a tedious task. I think we need to at least double that to 6 weeks so that those of us (myself included) who take breaks are not removed. Anyone over 6 weeks should be considered inactive, and I'll accept their removal.

Either way, I got Star on my side, so I'm happy.
Neraphym Archaeon
Posted Image
GWAMM
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users