When discussing matters such as this, Kimo and Rat are both known to say the opposite of the truth. Kimo says it's false, so it must be true... Yet Rat says Kimo is wrong, so Kimo must be correct in saying that it's false. So is it actually true, or is it false? Or is there a deeper meaning? Maybe they both
are telling lies, and there exists an undiscovered concept in the science of discrete mathematics which will show that there exists some cosmic significance in this thread... Almost as if the very foundation of
logic is false!
I just proved that the universe does not exist. Good day.
(... And welcome back.

)