[ticktockclok]

I'm going to be making a couple of these threads, just a fun thought that I came up with.

[asyluman]

Asia+Russia


Corruption+Nukes+Huge Armies=Kill

America might hold out for a while, but Asia is HUGE.

[Neraphym]

Yeah, asia has good technology (Japan), billions of people (India and China), and tons of Nukes (Pakistan, Israel, India, China, Russia, maybe one more I'm forgetting...).

They could easily take over the world. America would have to fall last, though. The distance is too great, and the resources it would take to defeat America would be mind-blowing.

[Spikeout]

Asia has the oils and resources to hold their own and the ammount of nukes that Asia has compared to the rest of the world is really big. America would need another place to get their oils and fuel resources which would kill their economy.

[©allum]

Asia would win no problem...

[Aaron]

I suppose it would be close, but America and Europe may have a chance. Russia's nuclear arsenal is much greater though .

[Stealth X1]

This is simple really, im a Cadet in ROTC and we have studeied tactics. The USA Would launch all officails into Air Planes that DONT land untill conflicts over. All america BOOMER subs will go in DEFCON 2 and fire when America is fired apon. We in America have the water and air supiority and would win any battle we are put into, the size of there army doesnt matter when 1 nuke would take it out. Russia when at war keeps its offcials grounded so we could just bomb near them and as for asia a few nukes spread around would just wipe them out. Simply all we have to do Is launch a few nukes from our BOMMER subs. And I am proud to say we are the ONLY country with the technology to stop nuclear weapons even after there fired.

[Kakashi]

Rest of the world, usa would just send some nukes over Asia and then say "Nukes ftw, oil for us "

[Neraphym]

Well, most politicians clearly cannot see the tremendos advantage of missile interceptors, so budgeting that technology has put us a little behind. I am afraid I don't have enough confidence in our capabilities to deflect every nuclear warhead. I'd prefer to avoid this war at all cost. And if it does come to war, we, could not win without nukes. Of course, they could not reach us all the way over here (Navy pwnz0rs them), so the battle would be fought on Asian soil. Too many of them there, so we couldn't win. Neither side could win on an offensive, so it would have to end up being nuclear.

If it comes to that, we both lose.

[Goto]

Yes, the thing about deflecting missiles is that it's really hard to know how effective they will actually be in practice until it's too late.

While Asia would have a number of advantages, you also have to wonder how united they would be. Many of these countries (and those in the Middle East, since they've been mentioned) have had a history of fighting each other, particularly over things such as religious differences. If they spend half the time watching their allies, that puts them at a disadvantage.

[Ratty]

Yaaay Go asia!

Tanny would win!

[Neraphym]

Then again, we have hippies arguing over whether or not we go to war. It's a good thing they don't suicide bomb us though.

[Moogalite]

You are forgetting the economic side of Russia is in the european regions and wtf are you on about nukes.... they have been banned by Geneva Convention and they may have a few but mass production is monitored.... asia may hold more oil but their may be more theoretical oil wells in the areas around america which they have a right to... People wise i think the chinese would win because they have so many people they would make them commando into american cities its unlike these people to be united as Hindu's, Sikh's and Muslims do not get on... anyone remember Bosnia? Mass genocide over religion....... I think that the Americans could easily defend their territory they have a much more superior army but then you get the 1337 brits in proud to say only voluntary military force in the world so we actually get physically fit people in our armies... Pity about our navy nowadays... Firing nuclear bombs is rather stupid the oil wells would be contaminated by nuclear waste and Europe would object at having nukes fired at russia too close to European countries. Plus Russians are relatively peaceful and would rather ally with Europe than Asia.

[Red Sentinel]

AHH MOTHERLAND!

"Fire ze missiles"
"but i am le tired"
"well, take a nap, THEN FIRE ZE MISSILES"

[Goto]

You are forgetting the economic side of Russia is in the european regions and wtf are you on about nukes.... they have been banned by Geneva Convention and they may have a few but mass production is monitored.... asia may hold more oil but their may be more theoretical oil wells in the areas around america which they have a right to... People wise i think the chinese would win because they have so many people they would make them commando into american cities its unlike these people to be united as Hindu's, Sikh's and Muslims do not get on... anyone remember Bosnia? Mass genocide over religion....... I think that the Americans could easily defend their territory they have a much more superior army but then you get the 1337 brits in proud to say only voluntary military force in the world so we actually get physically fit people in our armies... Pity about our navy nowadays... Firing nuclear bombs is rather stupid the oil wells would be contaminated by nuclear waste and Europe would object at having nukes fired at russia too close to European countries. Plus Russians are relatively peaceful and would rather ally with Europe than Asia.

What do you mean by 'only voluntary military force in the world'?