Bush For Reelection? Yes.... or no?
#16
Posted 14 May 2004 - 08:34 PM
My Slogan:
Voting Bush or voting Kerry is like shooting yourself in the left foot or the right foot.
No, I don't like Bush. No, I don't love Kerry. Yes, I'm a liberalist. So shoot me.
Voting Bush or voting Kerry is like shooting yourself in the left foot or the right foot.
No, I don't like Bush. No, I don't love Kerry. Yes, I'm a liberalist. So shoot me.
Shake: I'm on TV a lot. This is my sitcom, with the--
Shake (On TV): I'm in your house.
Shake:...
Meatwad:...
Shake: With the sci-fi horror twist.
Shake (On TV): I'm in your house.
Shake:...
Meatwad:...
Shake: With the sci-fi horror twist.
#17
Posted 18 May 2004 - 04:24 PM
i no this is kinda l8 but for the one at the beging there was a revalt while britan and england sat down and let them die thats when we made our selfs look selfish
http://sigs.runescap...ser=marek999999
<img src="http://sigs.runescapehelp.net/sig.jpg?user=marek999999">
change marek999999 to your own username on runescape to see your own stats on 1
<img src="http://sigs.runescapehelp.net/sig.jpg?user=marek999999">
change marek999999 to your own username on runescape to see your own stats on 1
#21
Posted 20 May 2004 - 08:15 PM
Politics are what started all these problems in the world anyway.
Why the crap would Britan attack the colonies in the first place unless their government didn't want the colonist make an example?
And the media (which is democratic I might add) is dissing Bush because he's republican.
WTF else is going on in iraq?!
What about their new government, or their new army?
Nothing!
All you hear is "Another American killed in firefight!"
CRAP CRAP CRAP! F--- the media!
BTW: I'm liberal now.
And Bush sucks anyway...
but I went for the last.
Sorry that sounded a bit angry.
Why the crap would Britan attack the colonies in the first place unless their government didn't want the colonist make an example?
And the media (which is democratic I might add) is dissing Bush because he's republican.
WTF else is going on in iraq?!
What about their new government, or their new army?
Nothing!
All you hear is "Another American killed in firefight!"
CRAP CRAP CRAP! F--- the media!
BTW: I'm liberal now.
And Bush sucks anyway...
but I went for the last.
Sorry that sounded a bit angry.
HI! I'M BACK SPORADICALLY! Nobody probably remembers me :(
#22
Posted 23 May 2004 - 06:04 PM
I consider myself Republicrat (yeah, yeah, I know it's Liberal) and I don't believe that Bush should be re-elected. He screwed the economy, made us look stupid in front of our allies, and now we're in a war that lost its purpose (that was a pressured decision that should not have been made... and tell me! How does a search for weapons of mass destruction turn into the complete reconstruction of a nation?!)!!!!!!!!!
I think that Kerry should get a new slogan or something like, "The lesser of two evils! Vote Kerry!"
...That just won me over because it's true....
I think that Kerry should get a new slogan or something like, "The lesser of two evils! Vote Kerry!"
...That just won me over because it's true....
#23
Posted 23 May 2004 - 06:15 PM
LOL!
God I hate saying that.
Anyway.
Kerry is definatley a better choice, but Kerry might withdraw forces, and stopping mid campaign is stupid. Let Bush live out his miserable dream...
But then Iraq gives him the credit!!
god! I hate politics!!
God I hate saying that.
Anyway.
Kerry is definatley a better choice, but Kerry might withdraw forces, and stopping mid campaign is stupid. Let Bush live out his miserable dream...
But then Iraq gives him the credit!!
god! I hate politics!!
HI! I'M BACK SPORADICALLY! Nobody probably remembers me :(
#24
Posted 23 May 2004 - 06:26 PM
QUOTE (Roadtoad6 @ May 23 2004, 01:04 PM) |
I consider myself Republicrat (yeah, yeah, I know it's Liberal) and I don't believe that Bush should be re-elected. He screwed the economy, made us look stupid in front of our allies, and now we're in a war that lost its purpose (that was a pressured decision that should not have been made... and tell me! How does a search for weapons of mass destruction turn into the complete reconstruction of a nation?!)!!!!!!!!! I think that Kerry should get a new slogan or something like, "The lesser of two evils! Vote Kerry!" ...That just won me over because it's true.... |
If we went into Iraq, captured Saddam Hussein and all the people from regime, what are we supposed to do? Waltz rightout of there and hope that the people do stuff for themselves?
-The Infamous-
...Retired...Not returned
...Retired...Not returned
#26
Posted 29 May 2004 - 01:19 AM
QUOTE (Muler @ May 23 2004, 02:26 PM) | ||
If we went into Iraq, captured Saddam Hussein and all the people from regime, what are we supposed to do? Waltz rightout of there and hope that the people do stuff for themselves? |
Well, that was the idea...
HI! I'M BACK SPORADICALLY! Nobody probably remembers me :(
#29
Posted 11 June 2004 - 09:58 PM
Most reasons that people have for disliking Bush and thinking he shouldn't be re-elected are common misconceptions. Here are some of them.
Economy -- The country started out in debt, it's been in debt the entire time, and nothing that it does is going to change that. However, the media has led people to believe that the national debt is a new aspect of society, brought into play solely by Bush. It ISN'T. We've been in debt since day one, and have yet to get out of it. Also, though unemployment increased in Bush's first year, it has been steadily decreasing since then; because companies have been given tax cuts, they've been able to hire more workers. Also, though this is a personal opinion of mine, the US has been leaning more toward the capitalism upon which it was founded, and less toward what I call "demo-communism." "Demo-communism" revolves around the types of things that reached their peak under Clinton's administion, such as welfare. For those that don't know what welfare is, it takes tax money to give money to those that are too lazy to get jobs. "Demo-communism" also includes affirmative action and several other things that have decreased since Bush took office. The "No Child Left Behind" Act has caused a decrease in racially influenced affirmative action, and has brought the nation's education system closer to giving equal opportunity to students regardless of their background.
War on Terrorism -- The US does not get the majority of its oil from the Middle East. Actually, it gets most of its oil from Venezuela. Gasoline prices in the US have also been considerably lower than in other parts of the world until recently. Gas prices have increased to an extent since the war began, but that's more because of people trying to stop the war on Iraq than it is from the war on Iraq itself. If we take ANY oil from the Middle East, the media jumps on us and says we're only there for the oil. Hence, ways of getting oil have been limited due to the people against the war, not the war itself. Also, many people have used the propagandist technique of referring to an unconstitutional authoritarian government as a "soveriegn nation." Under that basis, you could refer to Nazi Germany or Militarist Japan as a similarly "sovereign nation." Nazi Germany, Militarist Japan, and Shiite Iraq have all been run very similarly, the people of such countries taken advantage of and led to believe that their race and/or religion is superior to all others. If that's what a "sovereign nation" is to you, I see no reason to oppose removing such a government from its position of authority.
These are some of the major issues that people have tried to use against Bush. I fully support his reelection in 2004 because of the many good things he has done for the country.
Economy -- The country started out in debt, it's been in debt the entire time, and nothing that it does is going to change that. However, the media has led people to believe that the national debt is a new aspect of society, brought into play solely by Bush. It ISN'T. We've been in debt since day one, and have yet to get out of it. Also, though unemployment increased in Bush's first year, it has been steadily decreasing since then; because companies have been given tax cuts, they've been able to hire more workers. Also, though this is a personal opinion of mine, the US has been leaning more toward the capitalism upon which it was founded, and less toward what I call "demo-communism." "Demo-communism" revolves around the types of things that reached their peak under Clinton's administion, such as welfare. For those that don't know what welfare is, it takes tax money to give money to those that are too lazy to get jobs. "Demo-communism" also includes affirmative action and several other things that have decreased since Bush took office. The "No Child Left Behind" Act has caused a decrease in racially influenced affirmative action, and has brought the nation's education system closer to giving equal opportunity to students regardless of their background.
War on Terrorism -- The US does not get the majority of its oil from the Middle East. Actually, it gets most of its oil from Venezuela. Gasoline prices in the US have also been considerably lower than in other parts of the world until recently. Gas prices have increased to an extent since the war began, but that's more because of people trying to stop the war on Iraq than it is from the war on Iraq itself. If we take ANY oil from the Middle East, the media jumps on us and says we're only there for the oil. Hence, ways of getting oil have been limited due to the people against the war, not the war itself. Also, many people have used the propagandist technique of referring to an unconstitutional authoritarian government as a "soveriegn nation." Under that basis, you could refer to Nazi Germany or Militarist Japan as a similarly "sovereign nation." Nazi Germany, Militarist Japan, and Shiite Iraq have all been run very similarly, the people of such countries taken advantage of and led to believe that their race and/or religion is superior to all others. If that's what a "sovereign nation" is to you, I see no reason to oppose removing such a government from its position of authority.
These are some of the major issues that people have tried to use against Bush. I fully support his reelection in 2004 because of the many good things he has done for the country.
Cspace - "Eagles may soar but turkeys don't get sucked into jet engines" says:
I bow to the supreme wrath of Lord Crescens.
I bow to the supreme wrath of Lord Crescens.
#30
Posted 06 September 2004 - 04:53 PM
I'm not even American and I reckon that Bush should get his *** out the Oval Office.
Seeing Farenheit 9/11 only strengthened my belief that George W. Bush is the most stupidest man in the Northern Hemisphere. He's a dumb***. :l
And to those 7 equally dumb members of our society; you have NO sense.

Seeing Farenheit 9/11 only strengthened my belief that George W. Bush is the most stupidest man in the Northern Hemisphere. He's a dumb***. :l
And to those 7 equally dumb members of our society; you have NO sense.

<CENTER>
<FORM NAME="marquee1">
<INPUT NAME="text" SIZE=25
VALUE=" Welcome to JK's ultimate Javascript tutorial! Have fun!"
>
</FORM>
</CENTER>
<script>
<!--
/*Text box marquee by Dave Methvin,
Windows Magazine
May be used/modified if credit line is
retained*/
ScrollSpeed = 100
ScrollChars = 1
function ScrollMarquee() {
window.setTimeout('ScrollMarquee()',ScrollSpeed);
var msg = document.marquee1.text.value;
document.marquee1.text.value =
msg.substring(ScrollChars) +
msg.substring(0,ScrollChars);
}
ScrollMarquee()
//-->
</SCRIPT>
<FORM NAME="marquee1">
<INPUT NAME="text" SIZE=25
VALUE=" Welcome to JK's ultimate Javascript tutorial! Have fun!"
>
</FORM>
</CENTER>
<script>
<!--
/*Text box marquee by Dave Methvin,
Windows Magazine
May be used/modified if credit line is
retained*/
ScrollSpeed = 100
ScrollChars = 1
function ScrollMarquee() {
window.setTimeout('ScrollMarquee()',ScrollSpeed);
var msg = document.marquee1.text.value;
document.marquee1.text.value =
msg.substring(ScrollChars) +
msg.substring(0,ScrollChars);
}
ScrollMarquee()
//-->
</SCRIPT>