I agree with Hillary and her stance against violent video games. I certainly don't want my children getting hands on a video game such as Grand Theft Auto without my permission (although they aren't old enough yet, lol). What Hillary wants to do is make sure the ESRB rates the games appropriately and not make mistakes like they did with GTA: San Andreas. Her law will fine companies who sell games to children under the rating level and fine companies who withhold information that would increase the rating.
who hates bush?
#31
Posted 04 August 2005 - 09:26 PM
I agree with Hillary and her stance against violent video games. I certainly don't want my children getting hands on a video game such as Grand Theft Auto without my permission (although they aren't old enough yet, lol). What Hillary wants to do is make sure the ESRB rates the games appropriately and not make mistakes like they did with GTA: San Andreas. Her law will fine companies who sell games to children under the rating level and fine companies who withhold information that would increase the rating.
#33
Posted 04 August 2005 - 11:26 PM

EDIT: dunno much bout this but is Hilary saying they're bad influences lol :$?
This post has been edited by Dave: 04 August 2005 - 11:26 PM


#35
Posted 05 August 2005 - 12:19 AM

#39
Posted 05 August 2005 - 05:51 AM
But banning it outright is silly.
But if parents give that game to their children, or buy it for their children, then fine.
People treat video games like childrens' toys when they shouldn't be, they should be treated more like movies.
This post has been edited by it is I and I is me: 05 August 2005 - 05:53 AM
#41
Posted 05 August 2005 - 01:10 PM
As a last note, I firmly believe that violence in video games does not make kids more violent. It does the exact opposite, it makes for a substitute for violence and crime. When most kids steal a car, they do it because they think it's cool, and they get an adrenaline kick out of it, now you can do the same in a video game, where noone gets hurt. Some with violence. People beat each other up because they're angry, now they can beat some random digital person up, still getting a release for their anger, but without hurting anyone.
#42
Posted 05 August 2005 - 05:48 PM
i wouldn't go so far as to say that these videogames are the source of the problems plaguing our youth. i AM certain, however, that these video games do contribute to our youth's problems by desensitizing them to crime and violence - the games suggest that it's fun or cool to blow police cars up with rocket launchers. again, although any teen with a 3-digit IQ will know the difference between videogames and real life, don't you think that there's something wrong with teens laughing at the sight of people being killed?
edit:
frty, why are you so opposed to Bush when Kennedy, who in your opinion was the greatest president ever, cheated on his wife with Marilyn Monroe (which, by the way, is considered a sin by the Catholic religion that you claim to be a faithful member of)? of course, my accusations are unfounded, but so are yours.
This post has been edited by Kaezion: 05 August 2005 - 05:52 PM