CurvedSpace Forums: Global Warming - CurvedSpace Forums

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Global Warming

#1 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Cspace {lang:icon}

  • Previously Cspace
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • {lang:view_gallery}
  • Group: Administrator
  • Posts: 9,756
  • Joined: 03-August 02

Posted 27 January 2007 - 07:12 PM

Do you think it's happening? If it's a problem, what can we do about it? Is it worth it?

Discuss eek13.gif
Posted Image
0

#2 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Nuu™™ {lang:icon}

  • OGFEWSWCSWOCSUUPOTOFTW
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 3,278
  • Joined: 01-June 05
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 28 January 2007 - 03:03 AM

Of course it is happening, the scientific community have been sure about it for years, and have known about it since the 1980s. It has been said that last year was the year when Global Warming got into mainstream politics. Howard is planning to start investing in nuclear energy as a result, even though solar would be a wise move.

As for what we can do about it, investing more money into energy production research would help.
I have trademarked the symbol: '™'. You fail at display names.



^ Thanks to Nazy for the... thingy ^

Things which you should look at:

SKoA - http://skoa.cspacezone.com/ , if you have any Age of Empires games.

The DS Garden Festival Minigame - Link , whether you play DStorm or not.

The Most Mysterious SSSS - Link For people who don't care about...things.

Like LEGO? Play Blockland!


I may be an Arbiter, but I'll always be a SeeDy little man.™™
0

#3 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Atilla {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,663
  • Joined: 20-November 03
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 28 January 2007 - 09:13 AM

We can push hard for Gore to run for president again.

Has anyone else seen An Inconvenient Truth?
<b>(\__/)</b>
<b>(='.'=)</b> This is Bunny. Put him in your signature and help
<b>(")_(")</b> him on his way to world domination.
0

#4 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Red Sentinel {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3,688
  • Joined: 26-June 04
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 28 January 2007 - 02:09 PM

Solar panels can only take up 15% of energy, the ones that we can buy.

We can produce some that can take up to 45%.

Think if we had some that could take up 90-100%.
0

#5 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Aaron {lang:icon}

  • Hai
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_gallery}
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 6,067
  • Joined: 26-December 04
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 28 January 2007 - 09:04 PM

I think it's a natural trend that is being helped along by humans. There's really not a whole lot that we can do about it. The periodic heating and cooling of the earth is normal.
0

#6 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Neraphym {lang:icon}

  • Do not want!
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 10,332
  • Joined: 29-October 03
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 28 January 2007 - 10:28 PM

While periodic heating a cooling are normal, they are related to fluxuations in carbon dioxide levels in our atmosphere. Whenever CO2 goes down, we have an ice age, whenever it goes up, we have a warm period. Right now, the CO2 levels are like 3 times higher than they have ever been in recent ages, and that is a direct result of mankind. Personally, I think they overexaggerate the effects this will have, and these effects don't bother me where I live, but I still think something should be done about it.

The solutions are simple, but not as cheap as ignoring the problem. It's a good thing America isn't run by huge corporations that pay congressmen to get elected... oh wait. Earth is screwed.
Neraphym Archaeon
Posted Image
GWAMM
0

#7 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Dragonman {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • {lang:view_gallery}
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 6,890
  • Joined: 11-November 02
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 28 January 2007 - 10:35 PM

It's always easy to ignore it now, but later.. who knows. We need to take responsibility instead of taking a risk.
Posted Image

"Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow."
--K
0

#8 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Cspace {lang:icon}

  • Previously Cspace
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • {lang:view_gallery}
  • Group: Administrator
  • Posts: 9,756
  • Joined: 03-August 02

Posted 28 January 2007 - 11:12 PM

It's true that fluctuations exist, and we've had ice ages and warm periods in the past... Warm to the point where we had no ice at the poles. This has been linked to greenhouse gases, the Earth's precession, and solar cycles. According to patterns seen in our geologic history, however, there is no evidence that we should be entering such a period now.

CO2 does cause global warming (whether natural or not). It's a definite greenhouse gas, and something we're pumping into the atmosphere all the time. The levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have been increasing steadily in the atmosphere at levels believed to be exponential. There is no doubt that we're contributing a lot to that... All the junk being pumped out of cars, factories, and for other uses all has to go somewhere.

So while it's true that natural processes may be involved, there is no evidence that I know of for them to actually be doing this now. Something has to be causing it. Whether or not we are entirely at fault, we are pumping junk into the atmosphere that is almost positively making things worse... With the levels we're dealing with, potentially much worse.


It will cost money to do something about it, but it will cost a lot more when things get out of control.


********************************************

Could global warming be turned back? Even if there's more to it than us, indeed I think it can. I won't go on about reducing our CO2 output as I'm sure we're tired of hearing, but what if we could suck the CO2 out of the atmosphere and turn it into something useful? eek13.gif
Posted Image
0

#9 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Jake {lang:icon}

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 4,637
  • Joined: 24-October 04
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 28 January 2007 - 11:26 PM

I have a tree that does a wonderful job at that.
0

#10 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Neraphym {lang:icon}

  • Do not want!
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 10,332
  • Joined: 29-October 03
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:49 AM

Trees are great, plant some more!
Neraphym Archaeon
Posted Image
GWAMM
0

#11 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Aaron {lang:icon}

  • Hai
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_gallery}
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 6,067
  • Joined: 26-December 04
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 30 January 2007 - 04:44 AM

Yes, plant trees! There really aren't enough around anymore ugh.gif .
0

#12 {lang:macro__useroffline}   x.. {lang:icon}

  • I Can't Decide On An Avatar
  • Icon
  • {lang:view_blog}
  • {lang:view_gallery}
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 6,143
  • Joined: 05-May 06
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 30 January 2007 - 03:47 PM

QUOTE(Red Sentinel @ Jan 28 2007, 02:09 PM) {lang:macro__view_post}

Solar panels can only take up 15% of energy, the ones that we can buy.

We can produce some that can take up to 45%.

Think if we had some that could take up 90-100%.


yes.gif

and btw,
QUOTE(Neraphym @ Jan 29 2007, 01:49 AM) {lang:macro__view_post}

Trees are great, plant some more!

biglaugh.gif
0

#13 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Legend2194 {lang:icon}

  • New Member
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 12-April 07
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 13 April 2007 - 09:00 PM

The problem is, instead of planting trees, people chop them. Deforestation is related to global warming and there aren't many things people can do about others chopping trees down. i think they should plant a two trees everytime they cut one down. i don't think thats happening though sleep.gif too bad
Never argue with idiots. By doing so, you lower yourself down to their level, and they will beat you by experience.
0

#14 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Nuu™™ {lang:icon}

  • OGFEWSWCSWOCSUUPOTOFTW
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 3,278
  • Joined: 01-June 05
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 14 April 2007 - 02:09 AM

QUOTE(Atilla @ Jan 28 2007, 07:13 PM) {lang:macro__view_post}
We can push hard for Gore to run for president again.

Has anyone else seen An Inconvenient Truth?


You know Al Gore's 'estate' as I believe it is called emits twenty times more carbon dioxide than the average American household, which would have to be a hell of a lot.

I still think there is too much hype about it nowadays, people are focusing on carbon dioxide and less on various other environmental disasters, namely nitrous oxides.

QUOTE(Cspace @ Jan 29 2007, 09:12 AM) {lang:macro__view_post}
Could global warming be turned back? Even if there's more to it than us, indeed I think it can. I won't go on about reducing our CO2 output as I'm sure we're tired of hearing, but what if we could suck the CO2 out of the atmosphere and turn it into something useful? eek13.gif


I saw a programme on SBS a few days ago listing five ways to do just that. I seem to remember they were:
  • Sending up a huge amount of mirrors into the upper atmosphere to reflect the Sun's rays
  • Creating huge towers or something to emit water vapour, thus creating more clouds.
  • Sending up thousands of rockets to emit sulphurous gases into the sky, thus creating a barrier for rays also.
  • Creating huge pipes to pump plankton into the 'deserts' of the ocean so that they could absorb carbon dioxide.
  • Building thousands of artifical trees to capture carbon dioxide from the air and then stuffing it underground.
Now, not only could each and every one of these solutions create more problems than they solve, they also cost vastly more than simply removing the carbon dioxide output. The reason John Howard's not moving in an environmental direction is because he fears that he may be jeopardising the economy. Therefore solving the problem rather than preventing it is really, really silly.
I have trademarked the symbol: '™'. You fail at display names.



^ Thanks to Nazy for the... thingy ^

Things which you should look at:

SKoA - http://skoa.cspacezone.com/ , if you have any Age of Empires games.

The DS Garden Festival Minigame - Link , whether you play DStorm or not.

The Most Mysterious SSSS - Link For people who don't care about...things.

Like LEGO? Play Blockland!


I may be an Arbiter, but I'll always be a SeeDy little man.™™
0

#15 {lang:macro__useroffline}   Rohtaren {lang:icon}

  • no chief big fart
  • Icon
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 923
  • Joined: 20-April 06
  • Location:Eorthe

Posted 14 April 2007 - 02:16 AM

30 years ago, scientists thought we were entering an ice age... they were clearly wrong, so why should we have what i like to call a "fire age"


besides, China, in the near future (as in iwthin a few decades) will be producing more pollution than the US. while they are beginning to place pollution control in the old smokestacks, its not enough, plus their cars are also a large producer of the pollution.

one thing humans could do is perhaps fertilizing, irigating, and planting in some of those great wastelands we have.
-stop using, or significantly lower the usage of coal and other fossil fuels, i mean, give mother nature some more time to make those fuels.
-we could start building "wind & solar farms" which would have the windmills, and solar panels all over the ground.

meh, quick ideas.
0

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users